The Scamdex Scam Email Archive X

Subject:  We need a response by 03/04 - Work with Google (new salary $89k in 2014)
From:  "Andrew Woods" <eye@chiantigreeked.com>
Date:  Mon, 03 Mar 2014 08:10:29 -0800
Category:  Generic
Date Added:  2016-07-20 21:07:38

An Email with the Subject "We need a response by 03/04 - Work with Google (new salary $89k in 2014)" was received in one of Scamdex's honeypot email accounts on Mon, 03 Mar 2014 08:10:29 -0800 and has been classified as a Generic Scam Email. The sender shows as "Andrew Woods" <eye@chiantigreeked.com>.

The email address was probably spoofed. Do not reply to or contact any persons or organizations referenced in this email, or follow any URLs as you may expose yourself to scammers and, at the very least, you will be added to their email address lists for spam purposes.


mxw@o7e.net
A BIG Opportunity For You Has Opened - March 3rd


Starting Monday - Work with these companies
ebay , amazon , Google,craigslist


The deadline to accept is March 4th

Does this interest you? Inform us of your decision here


Not many spots remain - Here are the details regarding the position Your Salary: $75 - an hour
Hours Per Week: You decide when you want to work
Positons Available: Two (2)
Work in your pajamas from anywhere in the world while increasing your 2014 salary to $89k+. This position (#2773495004281408361) has been held for you

Please go here before 03/04 to accept








You can elect to end these by simply going/here (Products_2_Profit)Academy_8984-Cottage_Canyone=Drive_Cedar|Hills|Utah_84062

You may also seek removal here ==4523_E_Kings_Avenue_PHOENIX_Arizona_85032-3422==



A further finding of our survey is that nearly 50 of pediatricians who prescribe a conventional topical pediculicide as first line therapy, administrate the same treatment in children under 24 months of age. As a matter of fact, about 40 of pediatricians choice malathion as first line treatment, and suggest this product also in children under 24 months. In general, conventional pediculicides are not recommended in children younger than 2 years 2729. Furthermore, malathion is not recommended in children younger than 6 years, because there are not enough studies to support its safety, and it is moreover contraindicated in children younger than 2 years 21. It is also of note that about one fifth of pediatricians prescribe dimethicone as first line treatment and only 40.1 prescribe it in children under 24 months. In fact, in this age group, dimethicone could be an excellent therapeutic tool, since it is odourless, nontoxic and generally well tolerated by children from 6 months of age 1517. It acts by coating the lice and causing suffocation and has neither pediculocide nor ovocidal activity. A study in the United Kingdom reported a cure rate of nearly 70 30, a study in Turkey reported cure rates of 92 31, and another large randomized trial conducted in Brazil 32, in which a different formulation of dimethicone was used 92 dimethicone, reported a 97 cure rate. Maybe it is a new product, there are few studies all from the same authors, and Italian pediatriciansFancelli et al. Italian Journal of Pediatrics 2013, 3962 httpwww.ijponline.netcontent39162Page 5 of 6prescribe it less than older pediculocides. Therefore, even if 2012 UK guidelines suggest di dimethicone as first line treatment, we believe that more studies are needed to assest efficacy and safety for young children. Furthermore, only 11 of pediatricians suggest only mechanical removal for children younger than 24 months. Wet combing is the preferred treatment for children younger than 2 years 27 and it also should be considered if parents prefer not use a pediculocide on their child. Wet combing is commonly suggested in association with topical pediculocides, in order to improve their efficacy. However, an observerblinded study by Meinking TL, has investigated the use of 1 permethrin creme with and without adjunctive combing and it has demonstrated the failure of nit removal combing when made by nonprofessional caregivers 33. Maybe, when pediatricians suggest the use of the comb, they should train parents to use the comb as appropriate 25. Finally, very few 3 pediatricians suggest a treatment with oils or other herbal products their safety and efficacy are currently unknown and they are not recommended 21. Our survey also shows that oral pediculocides Ivermectin and SulfamethoxazoleTrimethoprim are, correctly, very rarely prescribed. Recently February 2012, topical ivermectin lotion Sklice was approved by the FDA. It is indicated for the treatment of head lice in children aged 6 months and older it shows good therapeutic perspectives 34,35. Another result of our study is that the majority of pediatrician interviewed 72 recommend routine retreatment for all topical pediculocides, preferably on day 79, as well as many experts suggest 21. Improper timing of second application of pediculicides should be considered an important cause of treatment failure. In literature there is a lack of data about the real incidence of treatment failure in children. The majority of pediatricians interviewed 65 report a frequence of 10 or less of short term recidives 2 months from treatment, while nearly one third reports a frequence rate between 30 and 50. The majority of them believe that recidives are attributable to a reinfestation in the childhood community. More important, the ongoing presence of nits or itch is not a sign of treatment failure, since nits could be not alived. Only the finding of live lice, using a detection comb, two or three days after completing a course treatment two applications of treatment 7 days apart should be considered a sign of treatment failure 25. The persistence of living head lice after the use of pediculocides may have several causes, such as lack of adherence of the patient to the treatment protocol inadequate dosis or duration of treatment reinfestation lice reacquired after treatment and resistance of lice to pediculocides. Several studies report an increasing rate of lice resistance to topical pediculicides in the last years13,36,37. There are three main patterns of resistance genetic resistance the presence of polymorphisms in genes associated with resistance clinical resistance persistence of live lice after a cycle of application parassitologic resistance in vivo resistance of lice to pediculocide compounds. As Durand R describes in a recent review, permethrinresistant phenotypes are mostly associated with a recessive kdr trait, while no genetical mechanism has been formally reported for malathion 26. Now, resistance rather than a lack of compliance with treatment should be considered the main cause of a treatment failure 38. Currently, several strategies have been proposed to overcome a possible treatment failure. One of the strategies is the application of a product for a fullcourse treatment and, in case of failure, the use pediculocide with a different resistance profile 17,25. Only 37 of pediatricians interviewed used this type of therapeutic approach. Probably, the restriction of pediculocides availability only with medical prescription, the administration of these drugs at the right dose and with a correct timing may help in prevent treatment failure. The main limit of our study is that over 40 of pediatricians attending the conference did not respond to our questionnaire and nonresponders may be less updated on national guidelines as compared to responders pediatricians. Globally, the Italian pediatricians surveyed proved to be quite informed on head lice management. Moreover, pediatricians should advise parents that head lice infestation should be diagnosed and treated under the supervision of a physician. In fact, proper education of parents, other than continuous updating of pediatricians, may contribute to a better management of head lice in the community.Additional fileAdditional file 1 Questionnaire on the management and treatment of head lice for the pediatrician. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Authors contributions CF, MP, LG, MdM conceived of the study, performed the statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript. MP, PB, CM, EC participated in the design of the study and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript. Received 27 April 2013 Accepted 15 September 2013 Published 3 October 2013 References 1. Gelmetti C, Veraldi S, Scanni G Head lice proposal for therapeutic guidelines. Italian J Dermat Vener 2004, 13914. 2. Ciftci IH, Karaca S, Dogruo O Prevalence of pediculosis and scabies in preschool nursery children of Afyon, Turkey. Korean J Parasitol 2006, 449598. 3. Kokturk A, Baz K, Bugdayci R The prevalence of pediculosis capitis in schoolchildren in Mersin, Turkey. Int J Dermatol 2003, 42694698.Fancelli et al. Italian Journal of Pediatrics 2013, 3962 httpwww.ijponline.netcontent39162Page 6 of 64. 5.6.7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17.18. 19. 20. 21. 22.23. 24.25.26.27. 28. 29. 30.31.32.33.34.Volcsik R, Preuss P, Knaus B Head lice infestation in the Cottbus district. Z Gesamte Hyg 1990, 36614615. Durand R, Millard B, BougesMichel C Detection of pyrethroid resistance gene in schoolchildren from Bobigny, France. J Med Entomol 2007, 44796798. Buczek A, MarkowskaGosik D, Widomska D Pediculosis capitis among schoolchildren in rural and urban areas of eastern Poland. Eur J Epidemiol 2004, 19491495. Bolivar B, Villalbi JR Pediculus humanus capitis a municipal parasite campaign among schoolchildren. An Esp Pediatr 1984, 21757760. Frankowski BL, Bocchini JA Jr, Council on School Health and Committee on Infectious Diseases Head lice. Pediatrics 2002, 110643683. Tebruegge M, Pantazidou A, Curtis N Whats bugging you An update on the treatment of head lice infestation. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract 2011, 9628. Bukhart CG Relationship of treatmentresistant head lice to the safety and efficacy of pediculocides. Mayo Clin Proc 2004, 79661666. Meinking TL Clinical update on resistance and treatment of pediculosis capitis. Am J Manag Care 2004, 10264268. Burgess I How to advise a patient when over the counter products have failed. BMJ 2003, 3261257. Bartels CL, Peterson KE, Taylor KL Head lice resistance itching that just wont stop. Ann Pharmacother 2001, 35109112. Maunder JW Strategic aspects of insecticide resistance in head lice. J R Soc Health 1991, 1112426. SIP, ADOI, SIDEMAST Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of head lice 2010. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CDC Head lice 2010. On www.cdc.govparasiteslicehead. Pickering LK, Baker CJ, Kimberlin DW, American Academy of Paediatrics AAP Pediculosis Capitis. In Red Book 2009 Report of The Committee of Infectious Diseases. 28th edition. Edited by Pickering LK. Elk Grove Village 2009495497. Doulgeraki A Parental attitudes towards head lice infestations in Greece. Int J Dermatol 2011, 50689692. Counahan ML, Andrews RM, Weld H What parents in Australia know and do about head lice. Rural Remote Health 2007, 7687. Silva L, de Aguiar AR Survey assessment of parental perceptions regarding head lice. Int J Dermatol 2008, 47249255. Frankowski BL, Bocchini JA Jr, Council on School Health and Committee on Infectious Diseases Head lice. Pediatrics 2010, 126392. Meinking TL, Serrano L, Hard B Comparative in vitro pediculocidal efficacy of treatments in a resistant head lice population on the US. Arch Dermatol 2002, 138220224. Mumcuoglu KY, Hemingway J, Miller J Permethrin resistance in the head louse Pediculus Capitis in Israel. Med Vet Entomol 1995, 33032. Pollack RJ, Kiszewski A, Armstrong P Differential Permethrin susceptibility of head lice sampled in the United States and Borneo. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999, 153969973. Broad P, Carney J, Gee S, Healt Protection Agency North West The prevention, identification and management of head lice infection in the community 2012. On www.hpa.org.uk, review date November. Durand R, Bouvresse S, Berdjane Z Insecticide resistance in head lice clinical, parasitological and genetic aspects. Clin Microbiol Infect 2012, 18338344. Roberts RJ Head lice. N Engl J Med 2002, 34616451650. Frydenberg A, Starr M Head lice. Aust Fam Physician 2003, 32607611. Alexander KC, Fong JHS, PintoRojas A Pediculosis Capitis. J Pediatr Health Care 2005, 19369373. Burgess IF, Brown C, Lee PN Treatment of head louse infestation with 4 dimethicone lotion randomized controlled equivalence trial. BMJ 2005, 3301423. Kurt O, Balcioglu IC, Burgess IF Treatment of head lice with dimethicone 4 lotion comparison of two formulations in a randomised controlled trial in rural Turkey. BMC Public Health 2009, 9441. Heukelbach J, Pilger D, Oliveira FA A highly efficacious pediculicide based on dimethicone randomised observer blinded trial. BMC Infect Dis 2008, 8115. Meinking TL, Clineschmidt CM, Chen C An observerblinding study of 1 permethrin crme rinse with and without adjunctive combing in patients with head lice. J Pediatr 2002, 141665670. Eisenhower C, Farrington EA Advancements in the treatment of head lice in paediatrics. J Pediatr Health Care 2012, 26451461.35. Chosidow O, Giraudeau B Topical Ivermectin a step toward making head lice dead lice N Engl J Med 2012, 36718. 36. Downs AM, Stafford K, Harvey I, Coles GC Evidence for double resistance to permethrin and Malathion in head lice. BR L Dermatol 1999, 141508511. 37. Bayley AM, Prociv P Persistent head lice following multiple treatments evidence for insecticide resistance in Pediculus humanus capitis. Australas J Dermatol 2001, 42146. 38. Smith CH, Goldman RD An incurable itch. Head lice. Can Fam Physician 2012, 58839841.doi10.1186182472883962 Cite this article as Fancelli et al. Survey assessment on pediatricians attitudes on head lice management. Italian Journal of Pediatrics 2013 3962.Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central and take full advantage of Convenient online submission Thorough peer review No space constraints or color figure charges Immediate publication on acceptance Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar Research which is freely available for redistributionSubmit your manuscript at www.biomedcentral.comsubmit