Scam TagCloud

Scam Email Headers

EEEEEstdClass Object ( [return-path:] => [envelope-to:] => accounts@scamdex.com [delivery-date:] => Mon, 16 Dec 2013 17:08:23 -0800 [received:] => Array ( [0] => from mail-oa0-f68.google.com ([209.85.219.68]:47900)by lester.newsblaze.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)(Exim 4.80.1)(envelope-from )id 1Vsj93-000331-Vifor accounts@scamdex.com; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 17:08:23 -0800 [1] => by mail-oa0-f68.google.com with SMTP id h16so1630309oag.3 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 17:08:22 -0800 (PST) [2] => by 10.60.96.162 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 17:08:21 -0800 (PST) ) [dkim-signature:] => v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=BHvncpIuhNwH6MjO+1iGZs5IYCIC0+C3a3fTgrE/PKI=; b=oA/1XV9a5FQZtfZwOUlcf+xW82FccXTJ7/6IVbV/Ix4H9wrp1TVHfK+gLgOhGO4829 RYWxC39MVky73srtx0aWGbmcLWIjtaB3zMXanmKM1zhFzJTcwhQ9NWyjWDIkCiDN0EIH lMCyMVFbvRm2PV1DVd7Sa0VKO/zHM+xM9yXp/4TwwZsa4rDhtoCl/UKXC3PRtQ2T6tpH vB417TdUE32To3DpzEhK6g/etmNeC2wOV9l/BksicYt2cu4bH5kSN8rLxo+T1aFSZJiq 0ibxhYoR06maQDHL3AJ8R6mOYrVi+4X9cDnlYKznMMrYvHMAy+mReAGwllDT0mQWI76X fmqg== [mime-version:] => 1.0 [x-received:] => by 10.60.59.5 with SMTP id v5mr14122108oeq.30.1387242502228; Mon,16 Dec 2013 17:08:22 -0800 (PST) [date:] => Tue, 17 Dec 2013 09:08:21 +0800 [message-id:] => [subject:] => Re:Re:Re:Revised Invoice [from:] => Toney Adem [to:] => undisclosed-recipients:; [content-type:] => multipart/mixed; boundary=089e015376b6905c3c04edb090eb [bcc:] => accounts@scamdex.com [x-spam-status:] => No, score=-0.1 [x-spam-score:] => 0 [x-spam-bar:] => / [x-ham-report:] => Spam detection software, running on the system "lester.newsblaze.com", hasidentified this incoming email as possible spam. The original messagehas been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or labelsimilar future email. If you have any questions, seeroot\@localhost for details.Content preview: Hello dear, I am sorry for getting back to you very late, I was on leave and only came back to the office yesterday. As a matter of fact, we have evaluated your PI you sent to us previously. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.1 points, 4.0 required) pts rule name description---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (toneyadem[at]gmail.com)-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid [x-spam-flag:] => NO )

Community Action - SPAM/non-Scam Report

Occasionally, incorrectly categorized emails get into the Scamdex Scam Email Database and need to be removed. If this email has Personally Identifiable Information (PII), or is, in your opinion, from a bona-fide entity, let us know.

Scamdex will, as soon as is practicable, take-down any emails that in our opinion should not be in our database.
Note that ALL emails in the Scamdex Scam Email Database were received as Unsolicited Commercial Email, aka UCE or SPAM, via unpublished 'Honeypot' email addresses.