<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ScamBlog - One Mans Thoughts about Online Scams. &#187; Scamdex</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/internet_scams/scamdex/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog</link>
	<description>Scamdex&#039;s Somewhat Cynical Take on Scams</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:22:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Asterpix (who they?) vs. Google</title>
		<link>http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/2010/09/asterpix-who-they-vs-google/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/2010/09/asterpix-who-they-vs-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 22:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mxw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Email Scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scamdex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adsense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asterpix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[searchlight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/?p=564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some Background First A company called Asterpix (www.asterpix.com) have a cool tool (Searchlight) for websites (such as this one!).  They analyse the page you are on, include any recent search terms passed in (eg. from Google) and the website you &#8230; <a href="http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/2010/09/asterpix-who-they-vs-google/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/2010/09/asterpix-who-they-vs-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8230; From CPanel to &#8230;. what??</title>
		<link>http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/2008/12/from-cpanel-to-what/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/2008/12/from-cpanel-to-what/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 22:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mxw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scam Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scamdex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spoof websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpanel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dedicated servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hosting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/?p=393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am an old Unix dude, I have installed more different versions of Unix than most people &#8211; Everything from Sco Xenix/286 thru to Centos5.2 and I don&#8217;t usually have much problems &#8211; but as time wears on, my brainDisk &#8230; <a href="http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/2008/12/from-cpanel-to-what/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/2008/12/from-cpanel-to-what/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Scam Email Indexing Method (again!)</title>
		<link>http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/2008/03/new-scam-email-indexing-method-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/2008/03/new-scam-email-indexing-method-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 23:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mxw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Email Scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scamdex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/?p=241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s my third iteration on the same basic principle: take a carefully filtered and enhanced archive of 150,000 email messages and then sort, categorize and analyze them, then put them in a defanged, indexable/searchable list format so that people can &#8230; <a href="http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/2008/03/new-scam-email-indexing-method-again/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/2008/03/new-scam-email-indexing-method-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Long-needed Upgrades to Scamdex</title>
		<link>http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/2007/11/long-needed-upgrades-to-scamdex/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/2007/11/long-needed-upgrades-to-scamdex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mxw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scamdex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/?p=216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well to start with, I wanted to PHP-ize everything. SO I started looking at the Apache/PHP config and as usual, without backups or testing or anything, I dived in and threw the big red switch. Everything seemed to go ok &#8230; <a href="http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/2007/11/long-needed-upgrades-to-scamdex/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/2007/11/long-needed-upgrades-to-scamdex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scamdex on the Beeb!</title>
		<link>http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/2007/02/scamdex-on-the-beeb/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/2007/02/scamdex-on-the-beeb/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 19:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mxw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scamdex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/?p=135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scamdex got a mention on BBC Radio 4s new IT programme! The first episode, Staying secure in internet banking, discussed the increase in the number of customers banking online and the inevitable increase in the number of internet banking scams. &#8230; <a href="http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/2007/02/scamdex-on-the-beeb/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/2007/02/scamdex-on-the-beeb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/science/clickon/rams/clickon_20070131.ram" length="0" type="audio/x-pn-realaudio" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scamdex Logo Competition &#8211; Major Prizes!</title>
		<link>http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/2007/01/scamdex-logo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/2007/01/scamdex-logo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 19:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mxw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scamdex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/?p=131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you may have guessed, my design skills are not my best feature. Since I launched Scamdex in 2004, the logo I designed using the excellent (and simple) &#8216;Banner Maker Pro&#8216; product has remained. I recently bought a copy of &#8230; <a href="http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/2007/01/scamdex-logo/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/2007/01/scamdex-logo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Honey Pot&#8217; Forum lets Forum Spammers report themselves</title>
		<link>http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/2007/01/honey-pot-forum-lets-forum-spammers-report-themselves/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/2007/01/honey-pot-forum-lets-forum-spammers-report-themselves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 05:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mxw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scamdex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/?p=125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Forum has been created that you really, really shouldnt post on. That&#8217;s because it&#8217;s a so-called &#8216;honeypot&#8217; forum. It&#8217;s designed to attract those bots and individuals who pepper legitimate forums (fora?) withe simple spam, often of the most eggregiously &#8230; <a href="http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/2007/01/honey-pot-forum-lets-forum-spammers-report-themselves/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scamdex.com/ScamBlog/2007/01/honey-pot-forum-lets-forum-spammers-report-themselves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

